This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/45472] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472

--- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev <abel at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-19 09:28:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> By the way I think we could get cases where the user wrote volatile in one case
> and non-volatile in another so fixing up the merging is still a good idea.

Sure, but the comment 14 still applies -- I think that unless the middle-end
will have the proper volatile semantics, it will be wrong to hide this issue in
the scheduler, so I'm leaving this as it is for now.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]