This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libstdc++/51558] Declaration of unspecialized std::hash<_Tp>::operator()(_Tp) turns compile-time errors into link-time errors


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51558

--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-15 02:01:24 UTC ---
Would the condition of the static_assert need to depend on the template
parameter somehow, to avoid the case where no valid specialization can ever be
generated? (Which would be ill-formed, no diagnostic required, by [temp.res]
p8.)

e.g.

static_assert( integral_constant<int, sizeof(_Tp)>::value,
  "std::hash must be specialized for this type" )


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]