This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/51057] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O0 execution test on powerpc*-*-*
- From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 22:01:22 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/51057] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 -O0 execution test on powerpc*-*-*
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51057-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51057
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at libertysurf
| |dot fr, ro at CeBiTec dot
| |Uni-Bielefeld.DE
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2011-12-03 22:01:22 UTC ---
The main problem with this test is not ppc platform implementing real(16) as
two real(8), but rather platforms that don't have sqrtl (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-11/msg00079.html ).
Now this test has been motivated by the libquadmath, but is not specific and I
don't see why it should be xfailed if real(16) is available on a platform as
long as it gives a sensible answer as it is the case for ppc.