This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets
- From: "jimis at gmx dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:34:55 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-51094-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #10 from jimis <jimis at gmx dot net> 2011-11-11 23:34:55 UTC ---
Nevertheless, I'd prefer using ELF_STRING_LIMIT and ELF_STRING_ASM_OP names to
point out that they affect only elf_* functions. But this renaming would touch
various rare archs. Should I try it?