This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted
- From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 13:04:57 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/50976] [C++0x] literal operator with unsigned long long parameter not accepted
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50976-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50976
--- Comment #6 from Daniel KrÃgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2011-11-03 13:04:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> gcc version 4.7.0 20111031 (experimental) (GCC)
This difference shouldn't be essential, should it?
> I wonder if the testsuite was run when the gcc was built.
> It should have raised a boatload of flags there.
[..]
> I can't imagine how this could be target dependent though.
> I wonder if build logs could be found.
I wouldn't know where to find them :-(, but I always get my gcc installation
from
http://www.equation.com/servlet/equation.cmd?fa=fortran
and I cannot remember of having found a problem with them.
Could we possibly keep the bug open until - lets say - Monday? Hopefully a new
build is available then which I could try. Any other suggestion?