This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595
- From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:37:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50686-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-10-18 15:37:49 UTC ---
> --- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt <bernds at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-17 17:37:11 UTC ---
> Sorry, I was being imprecise - only the instances where we generate notes 374
> and 375 are interesting. Can you identify these two?
Sorry for being dense :-) I could using conditional breakpoints once I
had unraveled how to identify the note number from an rtx. Here's what
I found:
note 374:
(note 229 161 230 NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG)
(code_label 243 324 162 31 "" [1 uses])
.cfi_def_cfa 29, 80
.cfi_offset 16, -72
.cfi_offset 17, -64
.cfi_offset 18, -56
.cfi_offset 19, -48
.cfi_offset 20, -40
.cfi_offset 21, -32
.cfi_offset 22, -24
.cfi_offset 28, -16
.cfi_offset 64, -8
note 375:
(note 229 161 230 NOTE_INSN_EPILOGUE_BEG)
(code_label 243 324 375 31 "" [1 uses])
.cfi_def_cfa 29, 80
.cfi_offset 16, -72
.cfi_offset 17, -64
.cfi_offset 18, -56
.cfi_offset 19, -48
.cfi_offset 20, -40
.cfi_offset 21, -32
.cfi_offset 22, -24
.cfi_offset 28, -16
.cfi_offset 64, -8
Rainer