This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/34996] Base class of explicitly instantiated class doesn't get instantiated


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34996

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
                   |                            |com

--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-29 11:23:25 UTC ---
Jason can you clarify this?

I'm also personally very interested, because this behavior also weakens the
explicit instantiation testing in the library: in many cases, if there is a bug
in a base class, the test cannot reveal it!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]