This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/47436] [C++0x] Variadic base-specifier-list of union rejected
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:46:26 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/47436] [C++0x] Variadic base-specifier-list of union rejected
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47436-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-22 22:46:26 UTC ---
Good, let's close this as invalid, then.
Thanks for clarifying the error_at thing, I should give it more thought: I was
under the impression that we tend to avoid (not a strict rule) things like
"error: unions cannot have base classes" because on a given line a lot can
happen (other errors together with good code) and an accurate column number is
anyway less convenient (for sure to a human like me!) than a name.