This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9
- From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:28:45 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/50091] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -fstack-check gives bad assembly on powerpc-apple-darwin9
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-50091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50091
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-04 15:28:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Defining STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN to 1 for Darwin would be a separate thing.
> In particular, you'd need to test Ada to validate this change.
indeed, lucky I finally figured out how to get Ada to bootstrap on
powerpc-darwin9 then ;-)
(FTR, STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN is OK on i686-darwin9 and x86-64-darwin10 is
running)
> > ... running check again ...
... the tests were OK with the c-family + fortran (STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN +
comment 12).
I'm about to reg-strap w/Ada & java to check various WIP.. (long job, don't
expect an answer today) ..