This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libgomp/48841] [regression] lot more libgomp testsuite failures compared to 4.4.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841

Hin-Tak Leung <htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #10 from Hin-Tak Leung <htl10 at users dot sourceforge.net> 2011-08-05 23:44:55 UTC ---
Most strange -re-run 4.4.6 and got a different answer from previous
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-05/msg00074.html) - every part of
the resulting summary file is identical, except the libgomp section.
Here is the old 4.4.5, new 4.4.6, and the 4.6.1 from a few days ago:

4.4.5:
                === libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes            2463
# of unexpected failures        9
# of unsupported tests          2

4.4.6
        === libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes        2511
# of unexpected failures    9
# of unsupported tests        2

4.6.1
        === libgomp Summary ===

# of expected passes        2586
# of unsupported tests        3

These numbers make a lot more sense. The machine has not been upgraded nor used
all these times, so the only two changes are (1) use of absolute path in
configure, (2) during this run (in 4.6.1) I noticed /tmp was a bit small (it
failed quite early on with libnumber or libiberty) so set TMIDIR to a different
disk.

I don't think it is the path, but it is possible I just didn't notice a
not-enough temp space error; the other possibillity is some
transient/intermittent error (the alignment?). Anyway, since 4.6.1 seems to
work and fixes most of the regressions or what not, I am happy to let this one
go.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]