This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:17:20 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #24 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-07-22 17:16:43 UTC ---
As far as I can see, Vincenzo, in that case the problem is a bit different,
because those functions aren't ISO: should Intel issue an updated document
describing the builtins and acknowledging the new C++? To be honest I know
little about the way those builtins are "standardized", the way Intel issues
updates to the specs. Maybe you could open about that a separate "exploratory"
Bugzilla (in CC people like Uros)?!?