This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug lto/49700] LTO compile time hog


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49700

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-11 09:20:37 UTC ---
The

 phase parsing           :5086.93 (100%) usr   9.45 (100%) sys5213.35 (100%)
wall 1072513 kB (100%) ggc

line looks completely odd ;)  It would be interesting to know what broke the
LTO I/O type/merging accounting.

Honza?  The above is from LTRANS phase, so maybe there's some timevar
pushing missing?  It looks like materialize_cgraph is suspicious.

No, the ltrans object file is of no use.

Joost, can you point us to a source tarball?  Does the issue reproduce
with simpler flags (plain -O2 or plain -O3?  Esp. w/o -march=native?)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]