This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/34772] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] self-initialisation does not silence uninitialised warnings (-Winit-self ignored)
- From: "davi.arnaut at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:17:36 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/34772] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] self-initialisation does not silence uninitialised warnings (-Winit-self ignored)
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-34772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34772
--- Comment #22 from Davi Arnaut <davi.arnaut at oracle dot com> 2011-06-27 19:15:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
>> Actually, we would really like it. Currently, we have to disable it because
>> most of the warnings are bogus. New _valid_ warnings are welcome.
>
> If you think most -Winit-self warnings are bogus, this fix cannot help you.
Sorry, I wasn't talking about -Winit-self warnings. I meant that most
uninitialised warnings in C++ are bogus [1]. Hence, we have to work around this
by actually initializing certain variables. By initializing the variable we
lose coverage by tools such as valgrind,. The self-initialization trick allow
us to avoid this problem.
Also, we even had a runtime "performance issue" associated with it in debug
builds. A large structure (containing floats, etc) needed to be partially
initialized to silence the warnings, but it caused a penalty since it was
located in a hot function (ended up slowing our test suite).
Anyway, point is, it would be nice to have this fixed in the early 4.x
branches.
1. I believe there is a bug report about this.