This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler
- From: "dodji at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 22:27:05 +0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/49130] discrepancies between DW_AT_name and demangler
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49130-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-07 22:26:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think it would be nicer if there were a DW_AT_mangled_name we could use
> instead because it's shorter. This also would avoid inconsistencies.
Sorry, I don't understand this. What would DW_AT_mangled_name contain that the
DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name doesn't already contain? How would the content of that
new attribute be shorter than DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name, and how why would it
make us avoid inconsistencies?