This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/49175] vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux
- From: "janis at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:44:38 +0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/49175] vect/pr48172.c execution failure for ARM GNU/Linux
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-49175-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49175
--- Comment #3 from Janis Johnson <janis at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-31 22:43:42 UTC ---
Usually the vect tests only require effective targets like vect_int if they are
checking that particular optimizations took place. There are no such checks in
this test.
The vector tests use neon options if check_effective_target_arm_neon_hw (from
lib/target-supports.exp) returns true. The test the proc executes is:
int
main (void)
{
long long a = 0, b = 1;
asm ("vorr %P0, %P1, %P2"
: "=w" (a)
: "0" (a), "w" (b));
return (a != 1);
}
compiled with neon options. That test apparently passes, but there's a neon
instruction generated for the test that fails. Should the test used for
arm_neon_hw be different?