This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?
- From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:52:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-46145-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-25 19:52:04 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 19:52:02 2011
New Revision: 174228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174228
Log:
PR c++/46145
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Complain about auto typedef.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/auto9.C