This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/48831] New: check.c: Constant expression (PARAMETER array element) rejected as nonconstant
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:54:52 +0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/48831] New: check.c: Constant expression (PARAMETER array element) rejected as nonconstant
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48831
Summary: check.c: Constant expression (PARAMETER array element)
rejected as nonconstant
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: burnus@gcc.gnu.org
Blocks: 32834
I know that this PR is a duplicate of some PR which I cannot find.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/d0bd8bd1803b626e
has the following program, which is rejected with:
i3 = int(0, i2(1)) ! This line gives an error when compiling.
1
Error: 'kind' argument of 'int' intrinsic at (1) must be a constant
In check.c, there is a simple expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT check; however, using
gfc_is_constant_expr() doesn't work either as PARAMETER (arrays) are not
recognized as being constant. (EXPR_VARIABLE + FL_PARAMETER.)
I think expr.c's check_init_expr might be better (it is currently static);
however, I have the feeling all checks are wrong.
Note: Fortran 95 distinguishes between initialization and constant expressions,
in Fortran 2003 and Fortran 2008 they have been merged to a single type -
called "initialization expressions" in Fortran 2003 and "constant expressions"
in Fortran 2008.
TODO:
- Find out what F90's constant and init expressions mean
- Make the less powerful call the more powerful, except for -std=f95
- Add checks for init/constant following the F95 pattern everywhere instead of
using the half-baked EXPR_CONST or some made up test which check more, but only
locally (e.g. const_expr + const array, as done in simplify.c)
Note: The case below should unaffected by the const/init change and should be
already valid Fortran 95.
program p1
implicit none
integer, parameter :: i1 = kind(0)
integer, parameter :: i2(1) = [i1]
integer(kind=i2(1)) :: i3
i3 = int(0, i1)
print *, i3
i3 = int(0, i2(1)) ! This line gives an error when compiling.
print *, i3
end program p1