This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245

--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-28 11:18:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> > AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf.
> > given that Mike has approved, 
> > if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you
> > could apply it.
> 
> I have bootstrapped gcc on x86-64-darwin10 with the patch in comment #12 on top
> of revision 171401 without failures for the tests ran by lto.exp (full test by
> tomorrow).
> 
> Now I wonder what are the tests
> 
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20100722-1_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr46940_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr47188_0.c
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43157.c
> 
> supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because "only weak aliases are supported"
> on darwin and the other tests pass even without plugin support.

They are various tests for previously existing bugs (mostly ICEs).  Of course
they now work.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]