This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/48246] ICE in lto_wpa_write_files
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:08:07 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/48246] ICE in lto_wpa_write_files
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48246-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-03-23 13:07:58 UTC ---
> Honza, why do we even care to assert the above if we handle empty
> partitions just fine (in case of !i)? It looks like some partitioning
> sanity check to me, not something we should assert on.
The reason was that empty partition imply overhead and there is no need for
that, so I would preffer partitioning algs to never create the empty parts
(there was various issues with partitioning that lead to them).
But for release branch, dropping the assert is just fine.
Honza