This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/48038] [C++0x] stable_sort problem with C++0x and comparator by value
- From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:46:11 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/48038] [C++0x] stable_sort problem with C++0x and comparator by value
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-48038-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48038
--- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-03-09 12:46:07 UTC ---
By the way, as a note to Vincenzo, in general I don't really see the point of
comparators taking the arguments by value, thus ruling out move-only types,
among other issues (that clearly shows up in other areas of C++0x). In other
terms, I don't see the temporary workaround for this issue as a proper
workaround, more as a best practice ;)