[Bug tree-optimization/47838] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized "fundamentals..0"

["rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011.02.22 10:56:25
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-22 10:56:25 UTC ---
IVOPTs chooses (again) some unfortunate IV that is enough to confuse the
tree-dump scan.

  ivtmp.6_6 = (long unsigned int) &fundamentals[1];

vs.

  ivtmp.6_6 = (long unsigned int) &fundamentals[0];

The folding that is tested for should happen at loop header copying time.

Can you check if

Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c
===================================================================
--- testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c     (revision 170359)
+++ testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c     (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-ch" } */
 typedef union tree_node *tree;
 enum tree_code
 {
@@ -54,5 +54,5 @@ emit_support_tinfos (void)
 }
 /* We should copy loop header to fundamentals[0] and then fold it way into
    known value.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "fundamentals.0" "optimized"} } */
-/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "fundamentals.0" "ch"} } */
+/* { dg-final { cleanup-tree-dump "ch" } } */

works for you (it does for me) and commit it if so?

Thanks.