This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug lto/47841] [4.6 Regression] New guality test failures
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:08:17 +0000
- Subject: [Bug lto/47841] [4.6 Regression] New guality test failures
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-47841-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-22 08:08:08 UTC ---
And in case of
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O2 line 43 a.j == 14
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer line 43 a.j == 14
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O3 -g line 43 a.j == 14
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -Os line 43 a.j == 14
+FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none line 43 a.j ==
14
+FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c -O2 -flto line 43 a.j == 14
it is obviously a good thing that sra-1.c fails the same way with -flto as it
does without -flto, that means -flto is less buggier wrt. -g.