This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854
- From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:34:25 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/46878] V850 ICE in in maybe_add_or_update_dep_1, at sched-deps.c:854
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-46878-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-01-22 00:33:26 UTC ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/21/11 15:32, dj at redhat dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46878
>
> DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Attachment #23014|0 |1
> is obsolete| |
> Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
> AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |dj at redhat dot com
> |gnu.org |
>
> --- Comment #8 from DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com> 2011-01-21 22:31:37 UTC ---
> Created attachment 23074
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23074
> alternate patch 2
>
> This one checks to make sure there *is* an immediately preceeding insn.
> Better?
I'm still quite concerned you're papering over the problem. Can you
give a dump immediately before the setcc is removed?
Jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNOiXEAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7QYwIAIzmPzqeKqI5wyRACB4F0dLu
CeCWykoaGKSP5b/zHNB6eEethxcOKh2VC8vcpLkmaqx7zMGRx3biUAlrz0D/SXZc
0RWlQyPx2j+sUYWZbcNZbfH3b2Osl8AgsC7d3llKJK5zdkR1UYbS2hURodjyb/Y0
OjtyWD0layQQZ9/sCB8yZHTb7CRvPMDxHl4+vEe0vEBeGIHGsmOJRuR/iICqPm4O
EVV2A4x0ZCc5TAwdGZacyeJZN4chIW/BTlKDfyliCEnwjg0zpFwwH/uA+42EHd8y
I0kD86BhN/9D89WjiLxgpVXGGw91AE1ZWVdopDtpePppq+gV4++KsDnaE0DapBg=
=rJ+i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----