This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
- From: "dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 15:19:01 +0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-26854-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854
--- Comment #125 from Daniel Berlin <dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-18 15:18:25 UTC ---
>
> --- Comment #124 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2011-01-18 15:15:01 UTC ---
>>
>> This looks suspiciously like it's not using the DFS numbers
> It seems that they are used, just we do a lot of queries from
> register_new_assert_for
> according to my ^C GDB profiling.
>
Interesting, i wonder why et_splay shows up at all then.