This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/46915] Wrong code is generated for conditional branch followed by zero length asm


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-13 10:59:28 UTC ---
Yeah, the insn count for asm is just a guess.  You should never put inline asm
into a delay slot, you really don't know how big it is or if it is suitable for
the delay slot.
I guess the bug is in checking just for ASM_INPUT, that should be also testing
extract_asm_operands () != NULL_RTX.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]