This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.
- From: "pluto at agmk dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:19:43 +0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-46659-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659
Pawel Sikora <pluto at agmk dot net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Pawel Sikora <pluto at agmk dot net> 2010-12-07 22:19:39 UTC ---
here're the results for current git: 54486c25c3df3bdb314929fe30855f0d3bd2e0b5
200000 elements:
$ time ./t-libstdcxx
./t-libstdcxx 0,09s user 0,01s system 98% cpu 0,109 total
$ time ./t-stlport
./t-stlport 170,91s user 0,01s system 99% cpu 2:50,93 total
100000 elements:
$ time ./t-libstdcxx
./t-libstdcxx 0,05s user 0,00s system 95% cpu 0,056 total
$ time ./t-stlport
./t-stlport 31,59s user 0,02s system 99% cpu 31,622 total
50000 elements:
$ time ./t-libstdcxx
./t-libstdcxx 0,02s user 0,00s system 93% cpu 0,029 total
$ time ./t-stlport
./t-stlport 7,28s user 0,00s system 99% cpu 7,287 total
so... it's fixed.