This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263

--- Comment #37 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-26 15:08:34 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Awesome!

:-) thank you for caring.

> I still think that the output would be better if it was more consistent with
> the current way of printing template instantiations, that is, using "note:
> while expanding macro..." after the error/warning. If you look to the code for
> printing the instantiations of templates, you'll see that it also handles long
> nested templates and recursive templates. Perhaps the same code/algorithm could
> be used for printing this to avoid such problems.

Yes, I think so too. I will try to do that.

> In any case, you should seek comments from the decision-makers at gcc-patches@,
> not me, because whatever they want is what is going to be implemented.

Sure, I will do that eventually.

By the way, I started working on fixing the bug mentioned in
comments 2, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13. Now we seem to have the infrastructure to
do so. I will come up with a patch to fix this specifically, on top of
the patcheset of this PR.

Maybe I need a separate PR, I don't know.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]