This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants
- From: "dodji at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 15:08:44 +0000
- Subject: [Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-7263-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #37 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-26 15:08:34 UTC ---
"manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Awesome!
:-) thank you for caring.
> I still think that the output would be better if it was more consistent with
> the current way of printing template instantiations, that is, using "note:
> while expanding macro..." after the error/warning. If you look to the code for
> printing the instantiations of templates, you'll see that it also handles long
> nested templates and recursive templates. Perhaps the same code/algorithm could
> be used for printing this to avoid such problems.
Yes, I think so too. I will try to do that.
> In any case, you should seek comments from the decision-makers at gcc-patches@,
> not me, because whatever they want is what is going to be implemented.
Sure, I will do that eventually.
By the way, I started working on fixing the bug mentioned in
comments 2, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13. Now we seem to have the infrastructure to
do so. I will come up with a patch to fix this specifically, on top of
the patcheset of this PR.
Maybe I need a separate PR, I don't know.