This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/45700] [4.5/4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=fold bootstrap failures
- From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:35:49 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/45700] [4.5/4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=fold bootstrap failures
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-45700-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45700
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-26 09:35:40 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 26 09:35:35 2010
New Revision: 167168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167168
Log:
PR bootstrap/45700
* tree.h (build1_stat_loc, build2_stat_loc, build3_stat_loc,
build4_stat_loc, build5_stat_loc, build6_stat_loc): New inlines.
(build1_loc, build2_loc, build3_loc, build4_loc, build5_loc,
build6_loc): Define.
* fold-const.c (protected_set_expr_location_unshare): New inline.
(fold_convert_loc, pedantic_non_lvalue_loc): Use it.
(negate_expr, associate_trees, non_lvalue_loc, omit_one_operand_loc,
pedantic_omit_one_operand_loc, omit_two_operands_loc,
fold_truth_not_expr, invert_truthvalue_loc, make_bit_field_ref,
optimize_bit_field_compare, make_range, fold_range_test, fold_truthop,
build_fold_addr_expr_with_type_loc, fold_unary_loc, fold_binary_loc,
fold_indirect_ref_1, build_fold_indirect_ref_loc): Use builN_loc
instead of buildN followed by SET_EXPR_LOCATION or
protected_set_expr_location.
(fold_build1_stat_loc, fold_build2_stat_loc, fold_build3_stat_loc):
Use buildN_stat_loc instead of buildN_stat followed by
SET_EXPR_LOCATION.
* trans.h (build1_stat_loc, build2_stat_loc, build3_stat_loc,
build4_stat_loc): Removed.
(build1_loc, build2_loc, build3_loc, build4_loc): Removed.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fold-const.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.h
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree.h