This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap
- From: "bonzini at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:36:58 +0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-44970-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #100 from Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org> 2010-11-14 23:34:28 UTC ---
> Cool! The reduced code no longer makes any sense but it should compile.
> I'm sure this was a fair bit of work.
Actually delta made all the work down to 31 lines of typedefs/structs and 35
lines of mostly-dead code. All I did manually was remove the remaining Linux
structs (replacing them with multiple scalars), propagate constants, and little
more.
Anyway, I have a new patch that I'm bootstrapping; forward_propagate_asm wasn't
adjusting use->def info properly, and the new stricter checking caught that.
To avoid code duplication the patch is a bit different from the other. It's
more aesthetic differences than practical differences in behavior, but still I
prefer to test it first on x86_64 before posting it. It should take only a day
or two.