This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's
- From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:17:16 +0000
- Subject: [Bug target/43052] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-43052-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-10 21:17:09 UTC ---
Mine. I think we should go for the rep movq. Ideally we should track the
alignment from calloc call to use, perhaps by fusing the loops, but I am just
day dreaming with that ;))
I will take a look.
Honza