This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/46163] GCC Produces Invalid Assembly Code from Anonymous Function Syntax


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46163

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2010.10.25 09:43:27
                 CC|                            |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
                   |                            |ubizjak at gmail dot com
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.6
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> 2010-10-25 09:43:27 UTC ---
I think it is a bad idea to use $.1590 as function label.
.$1590 is a better one. But I don't see x86 backend can
do it by itself.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]