This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal
- From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:38:01 +0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostic w/ non-literal
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-45923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-08 18:37:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > It is not valid for real() to be constexpr in a non-literal class
>
> This is a helpful diagnostic. The existing one is not.
constexpr-basic.cc:9:20: error: enclosing class of âconstexpr double
complex::real() constâ is not a literal type
isn't clear enough? How about
"non-static member function %D declared 'constexpr' in non-literal type"
?