This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/40959] build fails - No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop.
- From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Sep 2010 00:32:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/40959] build fails - No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'. Stop.
- References: <bug-40959-17791@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #18 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-08 00:32 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > unwind-ia64_s.o(.text+0x30b2): In function `uw_frame_state_for':
> > ../.././../gcc-4.5-20091112/libgcc/../gcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:1788:
> > undefined reference to `_Unwind_FindTableEntry'
> > unwind-ia64_s.o(.text+0x7632): In function `_Unwind_FindEnclosingFunction':
> > ../.././../gcc-4.5-20091112/libgcc/../gcc/config/ia64/unwind-ia64.c:1745:
> > undefined reference to `_Unwind_FindTableEntry'
> > /usr/bin/ld: ./libgcc_s.so.1.tmp: hidden symbol `_Unwind_FindTableEntry'
isn't
> > defined
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > gmake[3]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
> > gmake[3]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/ports/lang/gcc45/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0/libgcc'
> > gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
>
> After making the change to libgcc/config.host that is also described in
> comment #5 I get the same.
>
> libc indeed does feature _Unwind_FindTableEntry() as I can easily verify
> with the following program:
>
> void _Unwind_FindTableEntry();
> int main() { _Unwind_FindTableEntry(); }
>
> Just, why do we then get this link failure? Adding -v I see that
> /lib/libc.so.7 is explicitly part of the collect2 invocation.
>
Because _Unwind_FindTableEntry is marked hidden.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959