[Bug c++/45249] Indirect variable parameters sometimes cause segmentation fault

["rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-11 20:33 -------
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > First off I already mentioned what is undefined in this example in comment #11.
> >  The part of the standard that mentions about arrays.  And how the address of a
> > scalar is considered an array of size 1.  I don't have the standard in front of
> > me right now but those are what I remember from the standard.
> 
> 
> Right. And I clearly explained in my comment #14 why you were wrong. Getting
> back to comment #11 so that we can run around in circles brings no improvement
> to this conversation, and you will just keep on being wrong, even if you had
> the standard in front of you, because your example in comment #11 does not
> correspond to the code I'm doing. My comment #14 explains what is the correct
> code for comparison.

We're indeed running in circles.  Maybe you can find someone that can explain
to you better on comp.lang.c.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45249