This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/45048] duplicate DW_TAG_variable
- From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Jul 2010 21:06:09 -0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/45048] duplicate DW_TAG_variable
- References: <bug-45048-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 21:06 -------
I suppose the duplicate is due to the "i" inside of "f".
But inside of f I see:
<2><78>: Abbrev Number: 7 (DW_TAG_lexical_block)
<79> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x3
<7d> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x8
<3><81>: Abbrev Number: 4 (DW_TAG_variable)
<82> DW_AT_name : i
<84> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<85> DW_AT_decl_line : 6
<86> DW_AT_MIPS_linkage_name: (indirect string, offset: 0xb): _ZN1S1iE
<8a> DW_AT_type : <0x5c>
<8e> DW_AT_external : 1
<8f> DW_AT_declaration : 1
I think this would be clearer if "i" were declared using DW_AT_import,
or at the very least using the outer declaration as a specification.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45048