This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/44325] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-109.c
- From: "mikpe at it dot uu dot se" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Jul 2010 10:06:48 -0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/44325] [4.6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-109.c
- References: <bug-44325-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-07-10 10:06 -------
This test now also fails with 4.5 branch on powerpc64. It's a recent
regression, introduced somewhere between 20100701 and 20100708.
The -fdump-tree-vect-details file shows:
> fgrep vectorized vect-109.c.110t.vect
vect-109.c:33: note: not vectorized: control flow in loop.
vect-109.c:26: note: === vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized ===
vect-109.c:26: note: not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store.
vect-109.c:20: note: vectorized 0 loops in function.
vect-109.c:55: note: not vectorized: control flow in loop.
vect-109.c:48: note: === vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized ===
vect-109.c:48: note: not vectorized: unsupported unaligned store.
vect-109.c:42: note: vectorized 0 loops in function.
so it's not the common problem with too many vectorized loops.
I'll try reverting the PR44284 backport.
--
mikpe at it dot uu dot se changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikpe at it dot uu dot se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44325