This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Apr 2010 11:00:08 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- References: <bug-40436-374@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-04-06 11:00 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size
regression caused by r147852
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #30 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:56 -------
> I think it is a really, really bad signal if a bug like this, where the
> revision that introduced the issue was identified >9 months ago, remains
> unfixed for GCC 4.5.
>
> I, for one, wouldn't care hunting down revisions that introduce regressions in
> stage1 anymore, if component maintainers and release managers just postpone
> fixing the issue until it is too late to fix for a release.
Well, the fix doesn't fix this bug. There's no patch to fix this
bug (yet). Also 0.5% code size increase doesn't look important
enough to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436