This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Apr 2010 10:56:27 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
- References: <bug-40436-374@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #30 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:56 -------
I think it is a really, really bad signal if a bug like this, where the
revision that introduced the issue was identified >9 months ago, remains
unfixed for GCC 4.5.
I, for one, wouldn't care hunting down revisions that introduce regressions in
stage1 anymore, if component maintainers and release managers just postpone
fixing the issue until it is too late to fix for a release.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436