This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken
- From: "matz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 Mar 2010 16:34:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken
- References: <bug-43333-12182@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 16:34 -------
Re comment #6: well, then we still need to fix the c++98 case.
Re comment #7: note carefully how I have avoided is_pod<> in the testcase,
but instead used the internal mean to implement the former. That's the
regression I'm interested about. (well, to tell the truth I would also
consider it a regression of is_pod<>, if not by the letter of the standard,
then as quality of implementation, because we _do_ have compiler support)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43333