This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c/42907] -fstrict-aliasing breaks valid code



------- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-30 22:41 -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> Steven:
> 
> > FWIW the tri-state solution is problematic because...
> 
> Fair enough. This is why you're the gcc developer and not me ;-)
> 
> However, correct output should be more important than optimized output.

It is.

> Also, I fail to see how my blog is considered trolling. gcc *is* breaking code
> without warning.

Well, your code invokes undefined behavior according to GCCs interpretation
of the C standard.  So it is not "breaking" it.

Also we can't really do better in the sense of making use of the invariants
the C standards guarantee and at the same time not "break" code like yours.
If it would be trivial and obvious to do so we would do it - it's not like
we are breaking your code just because we can.  It's because the compiler
does not see what you are intending to do.  This giving leeway to code
invoking undefined behavior might improve or regress from release to release.
The most important thing is to generate correct code from well-defined
input (and there are still bugs with that, so ...)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42907


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]