This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/42344] [4.5 Regression] ICE in rs6000.md with ipa-sra for 252.eon



------- Comment #4 from amodra at gmail dot com  2010-01-28 00:17 -------
I haven't looked in detail at this yet, but why are we getting nonlocal
sibcalls at all for sysv?  rs6000_function_ok_for_sibcall says we shouldn't. 
I'm not sure why the nonlocal sibcall patterns even accept DEFAULT_ABI ==
ABI_V4.

Incidentally, the reason why we can't do a nonlocal sibcall when using secure
plt is that pic_offset_table_rtx (got pointer reg, r30) needs to be live as a
pic plt call stub uses r30.  Since that register is non-volatile it can't be
live for the tail call.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42344


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]