This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/42286] October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math
- From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 5 Jan 2010 16:03:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42286] October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math
- References: <bug-42286-15150@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-01-05 16:03 -------
Subject: Re: October 23rd change to tree-ssa-pre.c
breaks calculix on powerpc with -ffast-math
On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, segher at kernel dot crashing dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #7 from segher at kernel dot crashing dot org 2010-01-05 15:57 -------
> With -fno-signed-zeroes, a-b*c is transformed to -(b*c-a), which is a machine
> instruction. If the result would have been +0 before, it now is -0.
> The code then takes the sqrt() of that; sqrt(-0) is -0. This then is
> passed to atan2(), which has a discontinuity at 0, and we get wildly
> diverging results.
>
> The compiler does nothing wrong here; the transformation is perfectly
> valid.
>
> A solution might be to transform e.g. atan2(x,y) into atan2(+0.+x,+0.+y)
> when -fno-signed-zeroes is in effect (and of course somehow make sure
> those additions aren't optimised away). Similar for other math library
> functions with discontinuities at +/- 0.
Right. Just it might be simpler with -fno-signed-zeros to
transform a-b*c to 0 + -(b*c-a). Of course if the result was -0
before then it will be +0 after either variant (and the atan2
discontinuity would still happen even with your fix).
Thus whatever "fix" the underlying problem is surely that calculix
is not really -fno-signed-zeros safe. Can't we get lucky again
as before by trying to recover the PRE code change?
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42286