This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.



------- Comment #6 from kkylheku at gmail dot com  2009-12-11 11:57 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > But I'm not convinced that doing this is always a mistake.
> > 
> > Since we don't care about the object, we must care about the constructor side
> > effect. I seem to be under the impression that ISO C++ allows the construction
> > of temporary objects to be optimized away---even if there are side effects in
> > the constructor or destructor! Therefore, it's hard to see a valid use case for
> > this.
> Certain temporaries (such as those created during copying or reference binding)
> can be optimised away, I don't think it's true of temporaries created
> explicitly like this.

I've gone over the relevant 14882:2003 sections and have come to the same
conclusion.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]