This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/42254] [4.5 Regression] Massive regression in the g++ testsuite due to revision 154890
- From: "howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Dec 2009 03:11:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/42254] [4.5 Regression] Massive regression in the g++ testsuite due to revision 154890
- References: <bug-42254-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-12-03 03:11 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> We still are seeing a few residual failures on x86_64-apple-darwin10 even after
> the removal of Taras Glek's patches from gcc trunk. The remaining failures
> are...
>
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/badalloc1.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/fntry1.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/rethrow3.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/vbase1.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.eh/vbase2.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh16.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh17.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh23.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh39.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh40.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/eh41.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/eh3.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init7.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/singleton.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/vbase2.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eh990323-1.C execution test
> FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eh990323-5.C execution test
>
> so more than a single patch was involved in these new c++ failures.
>
This is at r154931 and these failures all existed in r154891
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41988#c21).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42254