This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/42154] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code from (early) SRA
- From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Nov 2009 14:01:47 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42154] [4.5 Regression] Wrong code from (early) SRA
- References: <bug-42154-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #1 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-23 14:01 -------
I'm looking into this. This example shows why using access->expr to create new
expressions is a dangerous thing to do, at least in some contexts (which I did
not really realize until now). I'd better look at them all.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-11-23 14:01:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42154