This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug target/41665] Typo in addsi_1_zext?



------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-10-10 18:57 -------
For

    case TYPE_LEA:
      operands[2] = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0));
      return "lea{l}\t{%a2, %k0|%k0, %a2}";

Won't we get "(zero_extend:DI ...)" for operands[2]? Don't we
want "(plus:SI ...)" instead?


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41665


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]