This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815
- From: "developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Sep 2009 14:24:43 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/41405] [4.5 Regression] Bootstrap fails on *-apple-darwin* due to revision 151815
- References: <bug-41405-12313@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #26 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-09-21 14:24 -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> Created an attachment (id=18621)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18621&action=view) [edit]
> gcc45-pr41405.patch
as pre previous comment - this bootstraps OK i686-apple-darwin9.
1/ but the error output contains the following :
Assertion failed: (orig_str), function FixReferences, file
/SourceCache/dwarf_utilities/dwarf_utilities-49/source/DWARFdSYM.cpp, line
3157.
./libtool: line 7982: 98179 Abort trap dsymutil
.libs/libffi.4.dylib
ditto:
dsymutil .libs/libgfortran.3.dylib
dsymutil .libs/libobjc-gnu.2.dylib
dsymutil .libs/libgcj.11.dylib
1/ does that point to any specific area to check?
2/ I guess it's also possible that there's a bug in the darwin-specific code
that emits debug info for mach-o.
Where should one look for information that would allow one to prove that the
output is 'correctly formed'?
we'll need to do that anyway in order to formulate a radar.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41405