This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libstdc++/41061] Compile of program using std random fails.



------- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-08-15 17:41 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> I agree we'll wait and see.  I think he'll need comparison operators.  
> You could compare the contents of param_type because all the bits are 
> available as calls.  But you'll still want to compare the other private 
> parts of the states (such as other distributions).

Yes, but I think it's better to wait a bit more - should not be more than 1
month or two - because, *before* "conceptification", the comparisons did not
exist. By the way, if you have been able to find an ISO paper / discussion
around the time of the original "conceptification" where the rationale for
adding the operators was discussed, I'd like to see it...

> On a completely different note I seem to remember you saying that you 
> had some tools to check distributions and random numbers.  I think some 
> tools like that would be great for TR2 along with some tools to get 
> statistical moments.  Another day perhaps ;-).  I think if some user 
> were to actually try to pick their own numbers for the engine templates 
> that some QA tools would be essential.

Yes. I'd like to polish a bit some code developed with a friend, in private,
already rather close to do what we want wrt testing the shape of the
distribution in the testsuite. If you like, I can send you what I have...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41061


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]