This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/41061] Compile of program using std random fails.
- From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Aug 2009 17:41:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/41061] Compile of program using std random fails.
- References: <bug-41061-8829@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-15 17:41 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> I agree we'll wait and see. I think he'll need comparison operators.
> You could compare the contents of param_type because all the bits are
> available as calls. But you'll still want to compare the other private
> parts of the states (such as other distributions).
Yes, but I think it's better to wait a bit more - should not be more than 1
month or two - because, *before* "conceptification", the comparisons did not
exist. By the way, if you have been able to find an ISO paper / discussion
around the time of the original "conceptification" where the rationale for
adding the operators was discussed, I'd like to see it...
> On a completely different note I seem to remember you saying that you
> had some tools to check distributions and random numbers. I think some
> tools like that would be great for TR2 along with some tools to get
> statistical moments. Another day perhaps ;-). I think if some user
> were to actually try to pick their own numbers for the engine templates
> that some QA tools would be essential.
Yes. I'd like to polish a bit some code developed with a friend, in private,
already rather close to do what we want wrt testing the shape of the
distribution in the testsuite. If you like, I can send you what I have...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41061