This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/40551] Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy
- From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jul 2009 15:27:43 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/40551] Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy
- References: <bug-40551-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-07 15:27 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
> > You were right - contiguous does need initializing. Not for this case but
> > some of the other uses that I referred to.
> Paul, what is the plan? You had a 4.4 and 4.5 check in, contiguous is not
> initialized in 4.5. Do you want to fix that?
I somehow missed that it was checked in as part of PR 40646,
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=149262.
Thus: I think this PR be closed, can it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40551