This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/39129] The meaning of 'BB' in "too many BBs in loop"
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 May 2009 12:14:59 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/39129] The meaning of 'BB' in "too many BBs in loop"
- References: <bug-39129-17282@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-31 12:14 -------
Definitely spelling out basic-block is an improvement. Though it would be nice
to use 'control-flow' when appropriate, if we can exclude the non-empty
latch case from this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39129